Yesterday, a mother scolded her son because he was dragging his feet on his homework, repeatedly making mistakes on previously explained topics. Then, this mother was scolded by me: seemingly a study issue of the child, in reality, it is due to the child’s congenital mental and physical development deviation, lack of brain cell energy, extremely low learning efficiency, which is the fault of the parents because the child does not teach the father’s fault, you have given your child inadequate congenital capital. So, when we see disobedient and underperforming children, we should not blame them, you are not qualified…
In the past, the traditional notion was to prioritize the brain, thinking that a child’s poor learning was due to insufficient intelligence, while our theory of heart determines brain puts the heart first. Because heart determines brain power, low heart power leads to low brain power, resulting in various undesirable behaviors and symptoms. I find the heart theory very easy to understand. If the heart lacks nutritional support, remains overdrawn, what learning and talk about life can you expect for your child?
For example: when a child is lazy and dragging their feet on homework, if you consult a psychologist for advice to console the child, it will certainly be ineffective. If you approach with our heart theory, it may be effective. Strengthening the heart will definitely enhance brain power. If a child’s brain power is boosted, homework will be faster and more proactive. Heart is primary, everything else is secondary; following the heart is the stomach power. Because the stomach power continuously provides nutritional energy to the heart, if a child’s stomach power is lacking, their heart power won’t go far.
Finally, leaving a question: “If the child does not learn, could it be the parent’s fault?” This phrase is generally understood as the child not performing well due to the father’s lack of education. Actually, I believe this phrase is only half right, what does the other half refer to?
